There was an article in the National Post today about a group of parents who are fighting their elementary school’s decision to hang punch cards around all of the kids’ necks, and reward the kids with a “punch” on the “card” if the kids are caught being good. The bottom line is that there is a Halloween party being planned, that only kids with a certain number of punches will be permitted to attend.
The concern of the parents is that in a school with relatively few behaviour problems to begin with, even the well-behaved students are so obsessed with getting holes in their cards, that it’s distracting them from their studies and leading some of them to come home in tears.
This is a perfect example of how de-motivating a rewards system can be.
While it seems on the surface as though this is a great way to motivate students to shape up, what it does is put undue pressure on them to conform to an external code of behaviour. It teaches them nothing about behaving ethically for the sake of being a well-behaved child or because it’s the right thing to do. Instead, it teaches them that they deserve to be rewarded for doing the right thing.
And while some parents will say, hey, that’s the way the world works - you don’t get paid if you don’t do a good job and you don’t get good marks if you don’t study, I don’t see these things as being the same. Occasionally people are singled out for their heroic or “Good Samaritan” behaviour, but more often than not, we as adults are put into a position where we need to “do the right thing” simply because our inner compass tells us it’s what we should do, not because there’s a bonus for being a good person.
So where does that leave the kids at this elementary school in Kingston?
The principal reports that the punch card system was designed based on parent feedback, which, frankly, doesn’t entirely surprise me. The number of kids and parents I see who believe that any good turn deserves a reward, is shockingly high. (As are the number of entitled kids I see, but I’ll leave you to make a connection between the two, if you see one.) The principal also likened this program to the Air Miles: you are welcome to participate if you want to, but there is no punishment for not participating. The protesting parents disagree, and I see their point. This isn’t something like a fundraising contest, where you can throw your hat in the ring or not; this is a school-wide, holiday-based group of activities that well-behaved kids are being excluded from because of politics. A good kid, who behaves appropriately in class and at school in general, gets so worked up about meeting the required quota of holes that he’s coming home in tears, is told by his mom to withdraw from the program, knowing that means he will not be eligible to participate in Halloween activities, even though nothing in his behaviour — except the lack of participating in the punch card program — would suggest that he does not deserve to be there. Not exactly a punishment, perhaps, but how do you think that kids sees it? “Damned if I do, and damned if I don’t” would be my guess. What kind of lesson is that to teach?
If you happen to be a teacher at this school (Monsigneur Remi-Gaulin), I’d encourage you to pick up a copy of the book Positive Discipline in the Classroom by Jane Nelsen, for some ideas on how to motivate your students, cut down on the need for you as a teacher to be a disciplinarian, and get back to the stuff you love about teaching.
We need to be very careful about winning the battle (good behaviour) at the expense of the war (an internal sense of conscience and morality that will serve them throughout their lives).