Not familiar with this term? I had heard it in passing before, but there was an interesting article by Amanda Robb in the July 2008 issue of O Magazine about this style of parenting. The term was coined by former school principle Jim Fay and psychiatrist Foster Cline, MD, to describe mothers and fathers who “hover over their children”. The article begins with the story of a Missouri mom who created a fictitious boy named Josh on MySpace to “cyber-torment” her teen daughter’s former best friend. After “Josh” lead the friend along, he abruptly told her she was a bad person, everybody hated her, and that the world would be a better place without her. A few hours later, this girl hanged herself and died the next day.
Although this tragic story may be on the extreme end of the spectrum, overly-involved parents are apparently quite common: the article quotes a study done by Patricia Somers, PhD, who found that in the 60 American universities and colleges studied, “40 to 60 percent of parents engage in some type of helicoptering, such as helping with academic assignments, and as many as 10 percent actually write their children’s papers for them”.
Yikes! How’s that for preparing our kids for the real world?
Unless you want to be doing your kids’ laundry forever – which, let’s be honest, is an option you can choose – now is the time to arm them with the tools they’ll need to be a success, regardless of their age. There is a balance to be found between helicoptering and leaving our kids twisting in the wind. While a helicoptering parent prepares resumes and cover letters for her children, a democratic parent provides feedback and guidance, suggests where to look for resources to create a resume, and offers to role play interview questions. She does not call the recruiter or interviewer personally, and insist on an interview for her child.
We all want our kids to succeed. We don’t realize, though, that sometimes our best efforts undermine this success. Some helicopter parents do what they do because they feel the pressures of modern life are too much. That may be true – as the article points out, entry level wages for college grads dropped between 2001 and 2005, and the average (American) student’s debt is out of control. The problem with picking up too much of the slack for them is that then they never learn how to adjust to the realities of their life. It may not be ideal, but it’s the life and the society and the pressures we’re all dealing with now; how does protecting our kids from all of that, well into adulthood, really help them? Are these moms going to be calling their children’s employers to negotiate salaries when the “kids” are in their 50’s? When does it stop? Or does it?
Watching our children grow can be hard on parents. But we really do them a disservice if we insist on continuing to treat them as incapable children. Alfred Adler would say that pampering a child was worse than neglecting him, something helicopter parents would do well to reflect on. Instead of sending the message, “I have confidence in you – I’m here if you need me, but I know you can do it”, over-involvement may inadvertently send the message, “You can’t function without my help – you aren’t capable of running your life on your own”. Not only is it not a particularly empowering, confidence-boosting message, it doesn’t provide kids with the opportunities to experiment, practice, and learn so that they may go on to be healthy, productive adults. As parents, we can certainly recognize that life is not without its trials; are we truly preparing our kids to withstand them, or better yet, flourish in the face of them?
One important caveat is the finding by researcher George Kuh, PhD, who conducts the annual National Survey of Student Engagement. His findings demonstrate that students with involved parents “study more, have more frequent contacts with faculty, report greater gains in critical thinking during college, write more clearly, and talk to their peers more often about substantive issues than students with less involved parents.” So clearly, parents do matter.
Striking a balance doesn’t have to be difficult. The litmus test is simply: Is my child capable of handling this challenge/situation/task on her own? If she is capable but unprepared, then education is the only missing component (i.e. being capable of doing her own laundry, but simply lacking in instruction on how to actually do it). If she is not capable, the balance parents need to strike is determining how to act as a coach or consultant to help guide and provide her with important learning opportunities without taking over and furthering a reliance on someone else doing the hard stuff for her. The world of bosses, mortgages, and adult relationships is not always kind.
But it doesn’t have to be one or the other. There is a middle ground between helicoptering and neglecting, and it’s the best of both worlds for parents and children. Involved, caring, respectful, encouraging, and well aware of when to step back and let the kids do the work for themselves: the balance for great (and effective) parenting.